🔥 DeepEval 4.0 just got released. Read the announcement.
Multi-Turn

Turn Contextual Relevancy

LLM-as-a-judge
Multi-turn
RAG
Chatbot
Multimodal

The turn contextual relevancy metric is a conversational metric that evaluates whether the retrieval context contains relevant information to address the user's input throughout a conversation.

Required Arguments

To use the TurnContextualRelevancyMetric, you'll have to provide the following arguments when creating a ConversationalTestCase:

  • turns

You must provide the role, content, and retrieval_context for evaluation to happen. Read the How Is It Calculated section below to learn more.

Usage

The TurnContextualRelevancyMetric() can be used for end-to-end multi-turn evaluation:

from deepeval import evaluate
from deepeval.test_case import Turn, ConversationalTestCase
from deepeval.metrics import TurnContextualRelevancyMetric

content = "We offer a 30-day full refund at no extra cost."
retrieval_context = [
    "All customers are eligible for a 30 day full refund at no extra cost."
]

convo_test_case = ConversationalTestCase(
    turns=[
        Turn(role="user", content="What if these shoes don't fit?"),
        Turn(role="assistant", content=content, retrieval_context=retrieval_context)
    ],
    expected_outcome="The chatbot must explain the store policies like refunds, discounts, ..etc.",
)

metric = TurnContextualRelevancyMetric(threshold=0.5)

# To run metric as a standalone
# metric.measure(convo_test_case)
# print(metric.score, metric.reason)

evaluate(test_cases=[convo_test_case], metrics=[metric])

There are SEVEN optional parameters when creating a TurnContextualRelevancyMetric:

  • [Optional] threshold: a float representing the minimum passing threshold, defaulted to 0.5.
  • [Optional] model: a string specifying which of OpenAI's GPT models to use, OR any custom LLM model of type DeepEvalBaseLLM. Defaulted to gpt-5.4.
  • [Optional] include_reason: a boolean which when set to True, will include a reason for its evaluation score. Defaulted to True.
  • [Optional] strict_mode: a boolean which when set to True, enforces a binary metric score: 1 for perfection, 0 otherwise. It also overrides the current threshold and sets it to 1. Defaulted to False.
  • [Optional] async_mode: a boolean which when set to True, enables concurrent execution within the measure() method. Defaulted to True.
  • [Optional] verbose_mode: a boolean which when set to True, prints the intermediate steps used to calculate said metric to the console, as outlined in the How Is It Calculated section. Defaulted to False.
  • [Optional] window_size: an integer which defines the size of the sliding window of turns used during evaluation. Defaulted to 10.

As a standalone

You can also run the TurnContextualRelevancyMetric on a single test case as a standalone, one-off execution.

...

metric.measure(convo_test_case)
print(metric.score, metric.reason)

How Is It Calculated?

The TurnContextualRelevancyMetric score is calculated according to the following equation:

Turn Contextual Relevancy=Turn Contextual Relevancy ScoresTotal Number of Assistant Turns\text{Turn Contextual Relevancy} = \frac{\sum \text{Turn Contextual Relevancy Scores}}{\text{Total Number of Assistant Turns}}

The TurnContextualRelevancyMetric first constructs a sliding windows of turns. For each window, it:

  1. Extracts statements from each retrieval context node
  2. Evaluates each statement to determine if it is relevant to the user's input
  3. Calculates the interaction score as the ratio of relevant statements to total statements
Contextual Relevancy=Number of Relevant StatementsTotal Number of Statements\text{Contextual Relevancy} = \frac{\text{Number of Relevant Statements}}{\text{Total Number of Statements}}

The final score is the average of all relevancy scores across the conversation. This measures whether your retrieval system is returning contextually relevant information for each turn.

FAQs

When should I use TurnContextualRelevancyMetric instead of the single-turn version?
When retrieval happens turn-by-turn in a ConversationalTestCase and you want each turn's retrieval_context signal-to-noise measured in context. The single-turn ContextualRelevancyMetric inspects one retrieval against one query.
Is this a retriever metric or a generator metric?
A retriever metric. It only measures how much of each turn's retrieval_context is relevant to the user's input and never reads the answer — a low score points to a noisy retriever, not a bad generator.
How is relevancy different from Turn Contextual Recall and Precision?
Relevancy measures signal vs noise, recall measures completeness, and precision measures ranking.
My chatbot answered correctly but this score is low — is that a bug?
No. It grades the retrieved context, not the reply, so irrelevant nodes lower the score even when the answer is good. Tighten retrieval (fewer, more targeted chunks) to raise it.

On this page