🔥 DeepEval 4.0 just got released. Read the announcement.

DeepEval vs Langfuse

DeepEval and Langfuse solves different problems. While Langfuse is an entire platform for LLM observability, DeepEval focuses on modularized evaluation like Pytest.

Comparisons

TL;DR: Langfuse has strong tracing capabilities, which is useful for debugging and monitoring in production, and easy to adopt thanks to solid integrations. It supports evaluations at a basic level, but lacks advanced features for heavier experimentation like A/B testing, custom metrics, granular test control. Langfuse takes a prompt-template-based approach to metrics (similar to Arize) which can be simplistic, but lacks the accuracy of research-backed metrics. The right tool depends on whether you’re focused solely on observability, or also investing in scalable, research-backed evaluation.

How is DeepEval Different?

1. Evaluation-First approach

Langfuse's tracing-first approach means evaluations are built into that workflow, which works well for lightweight checks. DeepEval, by contrast, is purpose-built for LLM benchmarking—with a robust evaluation feature set that includes custom metrics, granular test control, and scalable evaluation pipelines tailored for deeper experimentation.

This means:

  • Research-backed metrics for accurate, trustworthy evaluation results
  • Fully customizable metrics to fit your exact use case
  • Built-in A/B testing to compare model versions and identify top performers
  • Advanced analytics, including per-metric breakdowns across datasets, models, and time
  • Collaborative dataset editing to curate, iterate, and scale fast
  • End-to-end safety testing to ensure your LLM is not just accurate, but secure
  • Team-wide collaboration that brings engineers, researchers, and stakeholders into one loop

2. Team-wide collaboration

We’re obsessed with UX and DX: iterations, better error messages, and spinning off focused tools like DeepTeam (DeepEval red-teaming spinoff repo) when it provides a better experience. But DeepEval isn’t just for solo devs. It’s built for teams—engineers, researchers, and stakeholders—with shared dataset editing, public test reports, and everything you need to collaborate. LLM evals is a team effort, and we’re building for that.

3. Ship, ship, ship

Many of the features in DeepEval today were requested by our community. That's because we’re always active on DeepEval’s Discord, listening for bugs, feedback, and feature ideas. Most requests ship in under 3 days—bigger ones usually land within a week. Don’t hesitate to ask. If it helps you move faster, we’ll build it—for free.

The DAG metric is a perfect example: it went from idea to live docs in under a week. Before that, there was no clean way to define custom metrics with both full control and ease of use. Our users needed it, so we made it happen.

4. Lean features, more features, fewer bugs

We don’t believe in feature sprawl. Everything in DeepEval is built with purpose—to make your evaluations sharper, faster, and more reliable. No noise, just what moves the needle (more information in the table below).

We also built DeepEval as engineers from Google and AI researchers from Princeton—so we move fast, ship a lot, and don’t break things.

5. Founder accessibility

You’ll find us in the DeepEval Discord voice chat pretty much all the time — even if we’re muted, we’re there. It’s our way of staying open and approachable, which makes it super easy for users to hop in, say hi, or ask questions.

6. We scale with your evaluation needs

DeepEval and Confident AI are two separate products built by the same team — not the same thing.

  • DeepEval is the open-source LLM evaluation framework: metrics, test cases, datasets, synthetic data generation, benchmarks, and CI/CD evals. It runs locally, requires no account, and works fully standalone.
  • Confident AI is an all-in-one enterprise platform for LLM evaluation, observability, and red teaming. It adds shared regression reports, online evals on production traces, monitoring, cloud-hosted datasets, prompt and model experimentation, red teaming campaigns, and team collaboration.

Confident AI open-sourced many of its metrics through DeepEval. That does not make them the same product, and Confident AI is not a UI layer on top of DeepEval.

Use DeepEval on its own for fast, code-first local evaluation and CI gates. Use DeepEval with Confident AI when your team needs:

  • Shared dashboards for metric distributions, averages, and trends across runs
  • Test reports to share internally or with external stakeholders
  • Centralized cloud datasets and golden management
  • Regression gates and side-by-side prompt and model experiments
  • Production trace observability and online evaluation of live traffic
  • Red teaming campaigns and safety testing at organization scale

The integration is built into DeepEval — connect once and every DeepEval run syncs to Confident AI without extra code.

DeepEval also pairs with DeepTeam, our open-source red teaming framework, which Confident AI's red teaming features build on the same way they build on DeepEval.

Comparing DeepEval and Langfuse

Langfuse has strong tracing capabilities and is easy to adopt due to solid integrations, making it a solid choice for debugging LLM applications. However, its evaluation capabilities are limited in several key areas:

  • Metrics are only available as prompt templates
  • No support for A/B regression testing
  • No statistical analysis of metric scores
  • Limited ability to experiment with prompts, models, and other LLM parameters

Prompt template-based metrics aren’t research-backed, offer limited control, and depend on single LLM outputs. They’re fine for early debugging or lightweight production checks, but they break down fast when you need structured experiments, side-by-side comparisons, or clear reporting for stakeholders.

Metrics

Langfuse allows users to create custom metrics using prompt templates but doesn't provide out-of-the-box metrics. This means you can use any prompt template to calculate metrics, but it also means that the metrics are research-backed, and don't give you granular score control.

DeepEval
Langfuse
RAG metrics
The popular RAG metrics such as faithfulness
Conversational metrics
Evaluates LLM chatbot conversationals
Agentic metrics
Evaluates agentic workflows, tool use
Red teaming metrics
Metrics for LLM safety and security like bias, PII leakage
Multi-modal metrics
Metrics involving image generations as well
Use case specific metrics
Summarization, JSON correctness, etc.
Custom, research-backed metrics
Custom metrics builder should have research-backing
Custom, deterministic metrics
Custom, LLM powered decision-based metrics
Fully customizable metrics
Use existing metric templates for full customization
Limited
Explanability
Metric provides reasons for all runs
Run using any LLM judge
Not vendor-locked into any framework for LLM providers
JSON-confineable
Custom LLM judges can be forced to output valid JSON for metrics
Limited
Verbose debugging
Debug LLM thinking processes during evaluation
Caching
Optionally save metric scores to avoid re-computation
Cost tracking
Track LLM judge token usage cost for each metric run
Integrates with Confident AI
Custom metrics or not, whether it can be on the cloud

Dataset Generation

Langfuse offers a dataset management UI, but doesn't have dataset generation capabilities.

DeepEval
Langfuse
Generate from documents
Synthesize goldens that are grounded in documents
Generate from ground truth
Synthesize goldens that are grounded in context
Generate free form goldens
Synthesize goldens that are not grounded
Quality filtering
Remove goldens that do not meet the quality standards
Non vendor-lockin
No Langchain, LlamaIndex, etc. required
Customize language
Generate in français, español, deutsch, italiano, 日本語, etc.
Customize output format
Generate SQL, code, etc. not just simple QA
Supports any LLMs
Generate using any LLMs, with JSON confinement
Save generations to Confident AI
Not just generate, but bring it to your organization

Red teaming

We created DeepTeam, our second open-source package, to make LLM red-teaming seamless (without the need to switch tool ecosystems) and scalable—when the need for LLM safety and security testing arises.

Langfuse doesn't offer red-teaming.

DeepEval
Langfuse
Predefined vulnerabilities
Vulnerabilities such as bias, toxicity, misinformation, etc.
Attack simulation
Simulate adversarial attacks to expose vulnerabilities
Single-turn attack methods
Prompt injection, ROT-13, leetspeak, etc.
Multi-turn attack methods
Linear jailbreaking, tree jailbreaking, etc.
Data privacy metrics
PII leakage, prompt leakage, etc.
Responsible AI metrics
Bias, toxicity, fairness, etc.
Unauthorized access metrics
RBAC, SSRF, shell injection, sql injection, etc.
Brand image metrics
Misinformation, IP infringement, robustness, etc.
Illegal risks metrics
Illegal activity, graphic content, personal safety, etc.
OWASP Top 10 for LLMs
Follows industry guidelines and standards

Using DeepTeam for LLM red-teaming means you get the same experience from using DeepEval for evaluations, but with LLM safety and security testing.

Checkout DeepTeam's documentation for more detail.

Benchmarks

DeepEval is the first framework to make LLM benchmarking easy and accessible. Previously, benchmarking meant digging through scattered repos, wrangling compute, and managing complex setups. With DeepEval, you can configure your model once and run all your benchmarks in under 10 lines of code.

Langfuse doesn't offer LLM benchmarking.

DeepEval
Langfuse
MMLU
Vulnerabilities such as bias, toxicity, misinformation, etc.
HellaSwag
Vulnerabilities such as bias, toxicity, misinformation, etc.
Big-Bench Hard
Vulnerabilities such as bias, toxicity, misinformation, etc.
DROP
Vulnerabilities such as bias, toxicity, misinformation, etc.
TruthfulQA
Vulnerabilities such as bias, toxicity, misinformation, etc.
HellaSwag
Vulnerabilities such as bias, toxicity, misinformation, etc.

This is not the entire list (DeepEval has 15 benchmarks and counting).

Integrations

Both tools offer a variety of integrations. Langfuse mainly integrates with LLM frameworks like LangChain and LlamaIndex for tracing, while DeepEval also supports evaluation integrations on top of observability.

DeepEval
Langfuse
Pytest
First-class integration with Pytest for testing in CI/CD
LangChain & LangGraph
Run evals within the Lang ecosystem, or apps built with it
LlamaIndex
Run evals within the LlamaIndex ecosystem, or apps built with it
Hugging Face
Run evals during fine-tuning/training of models
ChromaDB
Run evals on RAG pipelines built on Chroma
Weaviate
Run evals on RAG pipelines built on Weaviate
Elastic
Run evals on RAG pipelines built on Elastic
QDrant
Run evals on RAG pipelines built on Qdrant
PGVector
Run evals on RAG pipelines built on PGVector
Langsmith
Can be used within the Langsmith platform
Helicone
Can be used within the Helicone platform
Confident AI
Integrated with Confident AI

DeepEval also integrates directly with LLM providers to power its metrics, from closed-source providers like OpenAI and Azure to open-source providers like Ollama, vLLM, and more.

Platform

DeepEval integrates natively with Confident AI, a separate all-in-one enterprise platform for LLM evaluation, observability, and red teaming, built by the same team. Langfuse's platform is also called Langfuse. Confident AI is built for powerful, customizable evaluation and benchmarking on top of full observability, with red teaming baked in. Langfuse, on the other hand, is more narrowly focused on observability.

DeepEval
Langfuse
Metric annotation
Annotate the correctness of each metric
Sharable testing reports
Comprehensive reports that can be shared with stakeholders
A|B regression testing
Determine any breaking changes before deployment
Prompts and models experimentation
Figure out which prompts and models work best
Limited
Dataset editor
Domain experts can edit datasets on the cloud
Dataset revision history & backups
Point in time recovery, edit history, etc.
Limited
Metric score analysis
Score distributions, mean, median, standard deviation, etc.
Metric validation
False positives, false negatives, confusion matrices, etc.
Prompt versioning
Edit and manage prompts on the cloud instead of CSV
Metrics on the cloud
Run metrics on the platform instead of locally
Trigger evals via HTTPs
For users that are using (java/type)script
Trigger evals without code
For stakeholders that are non-technical
Alerts and notifications
Pings your slack, teams, discord, after each evaluation run.
LLM observability & tracing
Monitor LLM interactions in production
Online metrics in production
Continuously monitor LLM performance
Human feedback collection
Collect feedback from internal team members or end users
LLM guardrails
Ultra-low latency guardrails in production
LLM red teaming
Managed LLM safety testing and attack curation
Self-hosting
On-prem deployment so nothing leaves your data center
SSO
Authenticate with your Idp of choice
User roles & permissions
Custom roles, permissions, data segregation for different teams
Transparent pricing
Pricing should be available on the website
HIPAA-ready
For companies in the healthcare industry
SOCII certification
For companies that need additional security compliance

Confident AI is also self-served, meaning you don't have to talk to us to try it out. Sign up here.

Conclusion

If there’s one takeaway: Langfuse is built for observability and tracing, DeepEval is built for evaluation. They overlap in places, but the difference comes down to focus.

If you also need an enterprise platform on top of evaluation, DeepEval pairs natively with Confident AI, a separate all-in-one enterprise platform for LLM evaluation, observability, and red teaming, built by the same team. DeepEval and Confident AI are not the same product: DeepEval is an open-source framework, Confident AI is an enterprise platform you can graduate into when team scale demands it.

On this page